Business expenditure deduction denied where contributions lacked a direct commercial nexus and only remote employee benefit was shown.

Contributions to a school and a hospital development committee were not deductible under section 37(1) because they lacked the required business nexus. The assessee's alternative claim arose only after the section 80G deduction failed, as the recipients were not registered and could not issue the necessary certificates. The Court found that the payments did not advance business prospects, and any benefit to employees or their children was too remote to qualify as expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The question referred was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether contributions made to a school and a hospital development committee, after the claim under section 80G failed, were allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The claimed deduction under section 80G could not be sustained because the recipients lacked registration and could not issue the requisite certificates. The alternative claim under section 37(1) was examined on the footing that the expenditure must be incurred for business purposes. The Court held that the assessee's business prospects were not advanced by these contributions and that any benefit to employees or their children was only remote and not a sufficient business nexus.

Conclusion: The contributions were not allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1), and the question referred was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---