Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, pending the assessee's challenge before the Supreme Court, the writ petitions concerning recovery notices issued under Section 45(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, should be disposed of by granting time to seek interim relief and by restraining coercive recovery on deposit of a further amount.
Analysis: The petitioners pointed out that the underlying question of taxability had already been decided against them, but the civil appeal remained pending before the Supreme Court. The Court considered it appropriate to grant breathing time to enable the petitioner-company to move the Supreme Court for interim relief. It therefore directed a further deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within four weeks, as undertaken, and provided that upon such deposit no coercive process should be taken for recovery of the disputed demand during that period.
Conclusion: The petitions were disposed of by granting limited protective relief in favour of the petitioner-company, subject to deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs, and by restraining coercive recovery for four weeks.