Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight charges and transit insurance paid for transportation of goods to the buyer's premises, but reimbursed by the buyer, were includible in the assessable value, and whether the place of removal shifted from the factory gate to the place of delivery.
Analysis: The goods were required to be inspected and passed at the appellant's factory before dispatch, and the purchase arrangement showed ex-works pricing with freight separately reimbursed. Once inspection was completed at the factory, the subsequent transport to the Railways' stores was only for convenience and did not alter the point of sale or removal. The facts were found distinguishable from a case where the price itself included transportation and delivery took place at the buyer's premises. On these facts, freight reimbursement and transit insurance did not form part of the assessable value.
Conclusion: Freight charges and transit insurance were not includible in the assessable value, and the place of removal remained the factory gate. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are sold on an ex-works basis, inspected and accepted at the factory, and transportation charges are separately reimbursed by the buyer, freight and transit insurance do not form part of the assessable value under excise law.