Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Decision: Revenue's Appeal Dismissed, Assessee's Appeal Allowed. Section 14A Disallowance Restricted.

        Addl. CIT, Mumbai Versus M/s Reliance Ports And Terminals Ltd. (Engineering & Construction Division Erstwhile Reliance Engg. Associates And Vice-Versa

        Addl. CIT, Mumbai Versus M/s Reliance Ports And Terminals Ltd. (Engineering & Construction Division Erstwhile Reliance Engg. Associates And Vice-Versa - ... Issues Involved:

        1. Disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A.
        2. Addition on account of provision for wealth tax in book profit computed under Section 115JB.

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Disallowance of Expenditure under Section 14A:

        The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions by disallowing expenditure under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The disallowance made under Rule 8D(2)(ii) was reduced by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] from Rs. 16.05 crores to Rs. 26.64 lakhs. The CIT(A) observed that the AO did not provide detailed reasons for the disallowance and noted that the interest expenditure of Rs. 45.09 crores was directly related to term loans used for business purposes, not for investments generating exempt income. The CIT(A) directed the AO to modify the computation under Rule 8D(2)(ii) based on these observations, restricting the disallowance to Rs. 26.64 lakhs.

        For Rule 8D(2)(iii), the CIT(A) noted that investments not capable of generating exempt income, such as investments in Reliance Engineering (Middle East) DMCC and certain mutual funds, should be excluded. The AO was directed to recompute the disallowance out of administrative expenses at 0.5% of the average value of investments, excluding those not capable of generating exempt income.

        Upon appeal, the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s restriction of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) to Rs. 26.64 lakhs. The Tribunal also agreed that strategic investments and investments not yielding dividend income should be excluded from the total investment for Rule 8D(2)(iii) disallowance. After excluding such investments, the Tribunal found no basis for disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) but restricted the disallowance to Rs. 14,79,411 based on the assessee's working.

        2. Addition on Account of Provision for Wealth Tax:

        The AO added the provision for wealth tax to the book profit computed under Section 115JB. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, citing consistency with decisions in the assessee's own case for earlier years and a jurisdictional High Court decision in CIT vs. Echjay Forgings Pvt. Ltd. (251 ITR 0015). The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition, finding no infirmity in the order and following the jurisdictional High Court's precedent.

        Conclusion:

        The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal. The disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to Rs. 26.64 lakhs for interest expenditure and Rs. 14,79,411 for administrative expenses. The addition on account of the provision for wealth tax was deleted, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision. The order was pronounced in the open court on 23/11/2016.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found