TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellants entitled to interest on delayed refund payment per Circular guidelines</h1> <h3>M/s Bhilwara Spinners Ltd. Versus CCE, Jaipur - II</h3> M/s Bhilwara Spinners Ltd. Versus CCE, Jaipur - II - TMI Issues:1. Entitlement to interest on delayed payment of refund.2. Interpretation of Circular regarding payment of interest on delayed refunds.3. Pre-deposit amount considered for duty payment.Analysis:1. The appellants, engaged in the manufacture of yarn and fabric, were investigated for short payment of duty in 1998. They deposited an amount of Rs. 2 crores during the investigation. The Original Authority confirmed duty demand and used the deposited amount towards duty. However, the Tribunal later set aside the original order, directing the Department to return the deposited amount without delay. The appellants applied for a refund on 03/5/2001, which was sanctioned on 26/3/2002. Subsequently, they claimed interest for delayed payment of refund in 2008, which was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals) stating that the interest calculation starts after three months from the date of refund application, not from the original application. The appellants argued that they are entitled to interest as the refund was delayed.2. The Tribunal referred to a Circular by the Board stating that interest shall be payable for delays beyond three months after the final disposal of disputes. The Circular emphasized that refunds should be processed within three months from the Tribunal's order, failing which interest is payable. Citing a Supreme Court case and a decision by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, the Tribunal held that interest is due for the period after three months from the Tribunal's order until the actual sanction of the refund. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants are entitled to interest automatically without the need for a separate claim, setting aside the rejection of interest by the Commissioner (Appeals).3. The Tribunal noted that the Rs. 2 crores deposited by the appellants was considered a pre-deposit amount, not a regular payment of duty, as per an interim order by the Tribunal. This distinction was crucial in determining the entitlement to interest on the delayed refund payment. The Tribunal's decision was based on legal precedents and the interpretation of relevant Circulars and court judgments, ensuring that the appellants received their rightful interest on the delayed refund amount.
TaxTMI 