Mobile phone chargers treated as separate accessories and taxed independently despite being sold with handsets in one package.

Mobile phone chargers sold in the same package as mobile phones were treated as accessories, not as part of the handset, and therefore remained capable of separate sale and separate taxation under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The court applied binding Supreme Court precedent and rejected the contention that a package sale or excise-based source entry required the charger to follow the tax rate of the mobile phone. The chargers were held separately taxable at a different rate, and the assessee's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether mobile battery chargers sold along with mobile phones in the same package were liable to be taxed separately from the mobile phones under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: The dispute was governed by the Supreme Court's ruling that a mobile phone charger is an accessory and not a part of the cell phone. On that basis, the charger remains an independent product capable of separate sale and separate taxation. The argument that the package sale or the source of the entry under excise law required the charger to be taxed at the same rate as the mobile phone was rejected because the binding precedent was not confined to a particular State entry and controlled the issue.

Conclusion: The chargers were held to be separately taxable and not entitled to the same rate as mobile phones; the challenge failed and the decision was against the assessee.

---