Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the attachment of immovable property in tax recovery proceedings could continue after expiry of the period prescribed under Rule 68B of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Rule 68B prescribes that sale of immovable property in recovery proceedings must be completed within three years from the end of the financial year in which the order giving rise to the demand becomes final. The provision is mandatory and, by sub-rule (4), if the sale is not made within that period, the attachment is deemed to be vacated. On the facts, the relevant order became final on 10.08.2010 and the prescribed period expired on 31.03.2014. Continuation of the attachment beyond that date was contrary to the statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The attachment of the immovable property stood vacated and the challenge succeeded.