Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when the assessee was not given an effective opportunity to file objections and seek cross-examination of the alleged sellers, and whether the matter warranted remand for fresh enquiry.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on a surprise inspection and consequential proposals treating the purchases as suppression. The assessee sought an opportunity to contest the proposed additions and relied on the need for a fair enquiry. In such circumstances, where the impugned order proceeded after recording absence of objections, the requirement of a fair hearing and effective opportunity to meet the materials against the assessee assumed significance. The request for summoning the sellers and allowing cross-examination was also directed to the reliability of the purchase verification and the fairness of the assessment process.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for detailed enquiry, including summoning the sellers and permitting cross-examination. The writ petitions were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment founded on adverse material must comply with the principles of natural justice by affording an effective opportunity to contest the material and, where necessary, to test it through cross-examination before finalisation.