Cenvat credit refund cannot be denied for an incorrect ARE-1 declaration, but credit eligibility needs fresh scrutiny.

Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 could not be denied merely because the exporter made an incorrect ARE-1 declaration that credit had not been availed, as such a clerical mistake did not by itself defeat substantive entitlement. However, the admissibility of the credit, compliance with record-keeping and return-filing requirements, and the eligibility of the input-services component had not been fully examined, so the refund claim required fresh adjudication on those factual and eligibility issues.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was barred because the ARE-1 declaration stated that Cenvat credit had not been availed, and whether the refund claim required fresh verification of the admissibility of the credit and related input services.

Analysis: Rule 5 permits refund where accumulated Cenvat credit cannot be utilised against duty on final products or output services and the goods have been exported, subject to the prescribed procedure and verification of the correctness of the credit. The declaration in ARE-1 is not a statutory condition for denying refund, and an incorrect declaration made as a clerical mistake does not by itself defeat the substantive entitlement. At the same time, the admissibility of the credit taken, compliance with record maintenance and return filing, and the eligibility of credit relating to input services had not been fully examined and required reconsideration.

Conclusion: The declaration in ARE-1 did not by itself bar the refund claim, but the matter required fresh adjudication on the admissibility of the credit and the eligibility of the input-services component.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's substantive claim to refund was recognised, but the grant of refund was sent back for de novo examination on the factual and eligibility aspects.

Ratio Decidendi: A refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 cannot be denied solely because the exporter made an incorrect ARE-1 declaration, and the claim must be tested on export, credit admissibility, and procedural compliance.

---