Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of duty on molasses lost during storage and transfer was admissible despite failure to give intimation within 24 hours.
Analysis: The losses were explained as arising from handling, storage, leakage and evaporation in the course of keeping and transferring molasses, and were stated to be normal and unavoidable in the process. The requirement of intimation within 24 hours was held to apply only to losses or destruction caused by natural causes or accidents such as flood, cyclone or fire, and not to handling losses occurring during storage or transfer. The losses were also noted to be within the permissible limit referred to in the Board circular.
Conclusion: The rejection of remission was not sustainable, and remission of duty was to be allowed.