1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court affirms interest imposition under Income-tax Act for non-payment of demand. Revenue prevails.</h1> The High Court upheld the decision of the Assessing Officer to impose interest under sections 234B, 244A, and 220(2) of the Income-tax Act for non-payment ... Installments of tax fixed by A.O. after assessment β amount not paid by assessee demanded by A.O. β interest imposed u/s 234B for non-payment of demand is justified. Issues:Appeal against order dismissing interest under section 234B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Appeal against Dismissal of Interest under Section 234BThe appeal challenged the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal which dismissed the appeal of the Department and confirmed the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the recovery of interest under section 154 calculated according to the provisions of section 234B of the Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) set aside the demand of interest citing lack of reason for its imposition under section 234B of the Act.Issue 2: Assessment and Payment DetailsThe assessment order under section 143(3) was completed on November 24, 2000, demanding Rs. 3,39,279. The assessee paid instalments and a sum against the demand of the assessment year 1997-98, resulting in a refund of the excess amount. However, no payment was made against the demand of the assessment year 1998-99. The Assessing Officer calculated the interest under sections 234B, 244A, and 220(2) of the Act for non-payment.Issue 3: Imposition of InterestThe Department was directed to refund an amount, and interest was calculated for non-payment of demand for the assessment year 1998-99. The argument that there was no default in payment of advance tax due to the higher deposit was rejected, as the payment was specific to the demands of the assessment year 1997-98. The imposition of interest was deemed justified as advance tax for the assessment year 1998-99 was not paid.Issue 4: Judicial DecisionThe High Court set aside the orders of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), affirming the decision of the Assessing Officer. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that the interest imposition was reasonable and based on valid grounds. No costs were awarded in the matter.This detailed analysis highlights the key issues, assessment details, reasoning behind interest imposition, and the judicial decision rendered by the High Court in the appeal against the dismissal of interest under section 234B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.