Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether housekeeping services used for maintaining cleanliness of the factory premises are eligible input services for Cenvat credit, and whether the denial of credit and consequential interest and penalty on that count was sustainable.
Analysis: Housekeeping was found to be used for keeping the factory premises neat and clean, which was treated as a statutory requirement under Section 11 of the Factories Act, 1948. On that reasoning, such service was held to be used by the manufacturer in or in relation to manufacture, because manufacturing operations cannot be effectively carried on without compliance with the cleanliness requirement and the maintenance of a safe and efficient workplace.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on housekeeping services was held admissible and the denial of credit, interest, and penalty on that issue was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The dispute on housekeeping services was decided for the assessee, while the remaining appeals were not pressed and did not survive for adjudication on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Services used for maintaining factory cleanliness, where such cleanliness is a statutory and operational necessity for manufacturing, qualify as input services used in or in relation to manufacture for Cenvat credit purposes.