Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Entertainment Tax collected in relation to Cable Operator Service was liable to be included for service tax and, if the supporting documents had not been produced before the lower authority, whether the matter required remand for verification.
Analysis: The demand had been confirmed on the ground that the assessee had not shown Entertainment Tax separately in the bills and had not produced the relevant documents before the lower authority. It was found that payment particulars of Entertainment Tax through bank account and challans were available, though not fully placed before the original authority. The circular relied upon required separate disclosure in the bill for exclusion from service tax, but the existence of payment particulars meant the factual verification of actual payment had to be undertaken before deciding the taxability of that component.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority to verify the Entertainment Tax payment particulars, and if correctly paid to the government authority, the demand attributable to that amount would not survive.