TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Overturns Service Tax Liability Order, Emphasizes Statutory Provisions & Natural Justice</h1> <h3>Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II</h3> Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II - TMI Issues involved:1. Service tax liability under 'Works Contract Services' or 'Construction of Residential Complex Services' for the period October 2008 to 2012-13.2. Service tax liability on the amount collected as 'Management, Maintenance or Repair Services' by the appellant before handing over the complex to regular societies.Analysis:Issue 1 - Service Tax Liability under 'Works Contract Services' or 'Construction of Residential Complex Services':The appeal challenged the Order-in-Original confirming the demand raised under 'Works Contract Services' and service tax liability on the amount collected for 'Management, Maintenance or Repair Services.' The appellant argued that pre-2010, their activities did not fall under 'Works Contract Services' as they were engaged in constructing residential complexes and selling flats. They contended that post-2010, the statutory provisions deemed construction as a taxable service unless full payment was made after completion. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments, citing the need for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority in light of relevant case law and statutory amendments. The impugned order was set aside for further review, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice.Issue 2 - Service Tax Liability on Maintenance Charges:Regarding the service tax liability on amounts collected for maintenance of common facilities, the Tribunal referred to precedent cases where it was held that service tax is not leviable on such charges. Citing specific cases like Kumar Behary Rathi, Goel Nitron Constructions, and Hiranandani Constructions Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the issue was settled in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the portion of the order confirming the demand for service tax liability, interest, and penalties was set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, aligning with the established legal position on this matter.This judgment highlights the importance of considering statutory provisions, case law, and principles of natural justice in determining service tax liabilities related to works contracts and maintenance services in the construction sector. The Tribunal's decision underscores the need for a thorough review of relevant legal aspects before confirming tax liabilities, ensuring fairness and compliance with established legal principles.
TaxTMI 