1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT upholds penalty reduction to Rs. 3,567 under Finance Act</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce penalty to Rs. 3,567, equal to the service tax amount, as per ... Adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of Rs. 3,567/- but imposed penalty of Rs. 24,792/-. On appeal by the assessee, the Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the penalty to Rs. 3,567/- i.e. equal to the amount of service tax. Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 lays down in clear terms that penalty shall not exceed the service tax payable - order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is in accord with the provisions of Section 76 and therefore, requires no interference by the Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce penalty to Rs. 3,567, equal to the service tax amount, as per Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
