Cenvat credit refund and unjust enrichment bar cash refund where registration ended before the debit entry.

Where duty is paid through Cenvat credit and registration is surrendered before the debit entry, cash refund of the unutilized credit is not warranted on the facts found. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench principle that cash refund may be available only where credit is denied by departmental action and the assessee is compelled to discharge duty from PLA. Here, no duty had been paid from PLA for the disputed debit, and the credit would otherwise have remained unutilized, so allowing cash refund would result in unjust enrichment. The appellants were therefore not entitled to cash refund of the credit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to refund of the amount in cash after the duty had been paid through cenvat credit and the registration had been surrendered before the debit entry.

Analysis: The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench ruling that where credit is denied by departmental action and the assessee is compelled to pay duty from PLA, cash refund may follow to that extent. On the facts found here, the registration had been surrendered before the debit entry in the credit account, so the credit would otherwise have remained unutilized and no duty had been discharged from PLA on account of the disputed debit. In such a situation, cash refund of the credit would amount to unjust enrichment and was not warranted on the reasoning of the Larger Bench.

Conclusion: The appellants were held not entitled to cash refund of the unutilized credit on the facts of the case.

---