Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment proceedings and recovery action should be kept in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision on the challenge to Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: Section 23(1) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 enables an assessee to seek deferment where an identical question of law is pending before the High Court or the Supreme Court. The validity of Section 19(11) was already under challenge before the Supreme Court in proceedings initiated by the petitioner, and the outcome of that challenge would directly affect the petitioner's entitlement to tax credits under the provision. In these circumstances, the assessment proceedings were required to await the Supreme Court's decision, though the Court declined to quash the assessment order itself.
Conclusion: The request for quashing was declined, but the impugned assessment order was directed to remain in abeyance and no recovery action was to be taken until the Supreme Court disposed of the pending special leave petition.