Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the classification adopted by the service provider for payment of service tax could be reopened at the service recipient's end while considering refund under the export refund notifications.
Analysis: The refund claim arose from service tax paid on services used in export of goods and claimed under the relevant service tax refund notifications. The dispute raised by the Revenue was not directed to any reopening of the classification at the service provider's end, and the tax had already been collected under the category of technical testing and analysis services without objection at the time of levy. The authorities below held that once the classification had been accepted for payment of service tax, the same could not be questioned at the stage of refund in the hands of the recipient. The Tribunal agreed with that approach and found no reason to interfere.
Conclusion: The objection to refund on the ground that the services did not fall within technical testing and analysis services was not sustainable at the recipient stage, and the denial of refund was rightly rejected.