Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 40,00,000 made on the basis of AIR information on the footing that the amount had accrued in the relevant assessment year was sustainable, and whether the matter required verification to avoid taxing the same receipt twice.
Analysis: The receipt was stated to have been treated by the assessee as advance and offered to tax in the subsequent year, while the lower authorities proceeded on accrual in the year under consideration and on the basis of TDS credit claimed in that year. The appellate record did not contain sufficient material to conclusively verify the assessee's claim that the same amount had already been offered to tax in the subsequent assessment year. In these circumstances, the issue required factual re-examination so that the same receipt was not brought to tax twice and the corresponding TDS credit, if otherwise admissible, was granted in the correct year.
Conclusion: The addition was set aside for fresh verification by the Assessing Officer, with direction to ensure that the amount was not taxed in both years and that TDS credit was allowed in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A receipt should not be taxed twice, and where the year of accrual and the year of taxation are disputed on limited material, the matter may be remanded for verification of the correct year of assessability and corresponding TDS credit.