Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the authorities could provisionally attach the assessee's bank account under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2005 when the substantial demand related to entry tax under the Gujarat Tax on Entry of Specified Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001 and the assessment was still pending.
Analysis: Section 45(1) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2005 permits provisional attachment pending assessment or reassessment to protect the revenue's interest. The entry tax enactment contains no corresponding provision conferring such power. A power available under one statute cannot be extended to a different enactment by implication, especially where the disputed liability substantially consisted of entry tax. The assessee had already made a substantial deposit towards the estimated liability, which weighed against continued attachment.
Conclusion: The provisional attachment of the bank account was unauthorized and could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned attachment order was set aside and the petition succeeded to that extent.
Ratio Decidendi: Provisional attachment can be exercised only when the governing statute expressly confers that power, and a power under one fiscal enactment cannot be transposed to another absent statutory authority.