Tribunal overturns credit denial, finding lack of evidence and unjustified allegations.

The Tribunal set aside the denial of credit to M/s. Agarwal Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. based on invoices from M/s. R.K. Enterprises. Despite initial discrepancies, the appellant provided evidence of goods receipt and lawful payment, refuting the allegations. Relying on precedents and lack of contradictory evidence, the Tribunal found the denial unjustified. Following past decisions and High Court jurisdiction, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, absolving the appellants from penalties and overturning duty demands.

---

---

Issues:
Denial of credit to the main appellant M/s. Agarwal Metal Works Pvt. Ltd., duty demand, interest, and penalty imposition based on invoices issued by M/s. R.K. Enterprises.

Analysis:

The main issue in this case revolves around the denial of credit to the main appellant, M/s. Agarwal Metal Works Pvt. Ltd., and the subsequent duty demand, interest, and penalty imposition based on invoices issued by M/s. R.K. Enterprises. The investigation conducted revealed discrepancies where the first stage dealer, M/s. R.K. Enterprises, claimed to have issued cenvatable invoices without supplying the goods. However, the main appellant was able to produce evidence such as octroi receipt of the transporter, sales tax check post documents, and proof of payment through account payee cheques to demonstrate that they had indeed received the goods for the manufacture of their final products cleared on payment of duty.

The appellant's counsel argued that the denial of credit solely based on the statement of a third party, i.e., M/s. R.K. Enterprises, was unjustified. They cited relevant precedents such as the cases of P.P. Oxide-2016, Garima Enterprises-2009, and P.P. Oxide-2015 to support their contention that credit cannot be denied merely on the basis of a statement without concrete evidence to the contrary. The appellant successfully refuted the allegations by providing substantial evidence to prove the receipt of goods and lawful payment for the same.

The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and examining the evidence presented, found that the main allegation for credit denial was primarily based on the statement of R.K. Gupta from M/s. R.K. Enterprises. However, the appellant's evidence, including documentation of goods received, payment records, and lack of contradictory evidence from the Revenue, led the Tribunal to set aside the denial of credit. Relying on past decisions and the jurisdictional High Court of Punjab & Haryana, the Tribunal concluded that the denial of credit and subsequent duty demand were unjustified. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, thereby absolving the appellants from penalties.

---