TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the imported old and used digital multifunction print and copy machines were sustainable under the Customs law in view of the jurisdictional High Court's approval of the earlier Tribunal view; (ii) Whether redemption fine and penalty were still payable in respect of the imported analogue photocopiers.
Issue (i): Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the imported old and used digital multifunction print and copy machines were sustainable under the Customs law in view of the jurisdictional High Court's approval of the earlier Tribunal view.
Analysis: The imported digital multifunction machines were covered by an identical controversy that had already been decided in favour of importers by the Tribunal, and that view had been upheld by the jurisdictional High Court. In that setting, the basis for sustaining confiscation-related monetary consequences on those machines did not survive.
Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty on the digital multifunction machines were not sustainable and were set aside.
Issue (ii): Whether redemption fine and penalty were still payable in respect of the imported analogue photocopiers.
Analysis: The analogue photocopiers stood on a different footing. No finding extending the benefit of the earlier ruling to that item was available, and the import remained liable to the consequences already attracted in respect of that component of the consignment.
Conclusion: Redemption fine and penalty were upheld for the analogue photocopiers, with the amounts modified as directed.
Final Conclusion: Relief was granted for the digital multifunction machines, but the liability relating to the analogue photocopiers was maintained with a reduced monetary burden.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an identical issue has been conclusively settled in favour of the importer by binding jurisdictional precedent, confiscation-linked redemption fine and penalty cannot be sustained for that covered commodity, but separate items not covered by that precedent remain independently liable.
TaxTMI 
