Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 76(6) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was justified where the declaration form VAT-47 accompanying the goods in movement was incomplete and not punched in the prescribed particulars.
Analysis: Section 76 of the Act and Rule 53 of the Rules require goods in movement to be accompanied by prescribed documents and by Form VAT-47 completely filled in all respects, with the value, date and month of use punched at the specified place. The form found during interception had blank columns in the relevant parts and was not punched in the prescribed manner. The statutory requirement was held to be mandatory, and the omission was not treated as a mere technical lapse. Following the governing principle that contravention of the declaration-form requirement attracts strict civil liability, the existence of other documents did not cure the defect in the prescribed form. Mens rea was held to be irrelevant for imposing penalty once the statutory breach was established.
Conclusion: The penalty was rightly imposed and sustained; the assessee's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The revision petition was dismissed because the incomplete and unpunched declaration form amounted to a statutory contravention warranting penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods in movement must be accompanied by a declaration form that is completely and properly filled in as prescribed, and breach of that mandatory requirement attracts penalty as a strict civil liability without proof of mens rea.