TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Disallowance of Expenditure on Gifts & Payments to Doctors Upheld</h1> <h3>M/s Shri Ramkrupa kedicare Versus ACIT, Circle-4, Baroda.</h3> M/s Shri Ramkrupa kedicare Versus ACIT, Circle-4, Baroda. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Confirmation of disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 5,97,314/- as non-business expenditure (gifts to doctors).2. Confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 53,41,049/- under Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act for non-deduction of TDS on payments to doctors.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Confirmation of disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 5,97,314/- as non-business expenditure (gifts to doctors):The assessee, a company engaged in running a Heart Institute, Critical Care Centre, and Diagnostic Centre, filed a return of income declaring Rs. 86,48,170/-. After scrutiny, the income was assessed at Rs. 1,55,19,515/- due to certain additions, including the disallowance of Rs. 5,97,314/- for gifts to doctors. The assessee contended that these gifts were for maintaining cordial business relationships with doctors, and thus, should be considered business promotion expenses allowable under Section 37 of the IT Act.The CIT(A) disallowed the expenditure, noting that the gifts were not verifiable due to the lack of details such as names and addresses of the recipient doctors. It was also observed that these gifts could be considered professional fees, requiring TDS deduction under Section 194J, which was not done. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the assessee failed to provide necessary details to verify the expenditure and facilitate tax recovery from the recipients. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 5,97,314/- was confirmed.2. Confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 53,41,049/- under Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act for non-deduction of TDS on payments to doctors:During the assessment, the AO noted an expenditure of Rs. 53,41,049/- towards laboratory charges, which was treated as professional fees paid to Dr. Dhiren Shah and others, requiring TDS deduction under Section 194J. The assessee argued that the services were provided directly to patients, making the patients liable for TDS deduction, not the assessee. However, the AO found that the payments were made by the hospital, and thus, TDS should have been deducted. The CIT(A) upheld this view, emphasizing that the laboratory services were integral to the hospital's operations and the hospital collected the charges, making it liable for TDS deduction.The Tribunal considered the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia), which states that disallowance cannot be made if the recipient has included the income in their return and paid taxes. Citing the Delhi High Court's decision in Ansal Landmark Township (P) Ltd. and the ITAT Agra Bench's decision in Rajeev Kumar Agarwal, the Tribunal held that the proviso is declaratory and curative, with retrospective effect from 01.04.2005. The issue was restored to the AO to verify if the recipients had included the income in their returns and paid taxes. If verified, the disallowance would be deleted.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the disallowance of Rs. 5,97,314/- for gifts to doctors and remanding the issue of Rs. 53,41,049/- disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) to the AO for further verification.
TaxTMI 