Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in setting aside the first appellate order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration when the appeal before the first appellate authority had been dismissed as time-barred without examination on merits.
Analysis: Refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal has the legal effect of affirming the assessment order. On that principle, an appeal lies against such an order and the appellate forum is competent to examine the dispute on merits. The Court relied on the settled position that dismissal of an appeal as barred by limitation does not prevent further appellate scrutiny, and that the Tribunal was not in error in proceeding in the manner it did, particularly where the departmental representative had agreed before the Tribunal to a remand in a similar matter awaiting the decision of the jurisdictional High Court on the underlying issue.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's order remitting the matter was upheld and no interference was warranted.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's appeal failed and stood dismissed, leaving the Tribunal's remand order intact.
Ratio Decidendi: An order refusing to condone delay in filing an appeal is treated as an order confirming the assessment, so the appellate forum may entertain the matter and decide it on merits.