Tribunal Grants Appellant Cenvat Credit for Disputed Input Services

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant Cenvat credit for the disputed input services related to structural fabrication, construction services, road construction, outdoor catering, rainwater harvesting, and other unspecified services. The appellant successfully argued that these services were used in or in relation to manufacturing activities, citing relevant case laws and statutory obligations.

---

---

Issues:
- Availment of Cenvat credit on various input services.

Analysis:
1. Structural Fabrication and Water proofing:
The appellant claimed Cenvat credit on services used for repair, replacing, and maintaining plant and building structures. The disallowance was based on exclusion clauses in the definition of input services. However, the appellant argued that these services fall under the inclusive clause of the definition. Citing case laws like Cargill India Pvt. Ltd. and Triveni Engg. & Industries Ltd., the appellant contended that these services qualify for credit. The Tribunal agreed, allowing the credit for maintenance, repair, and replacement services.

2. Construction Service:
The dispute involved services used in constructing residential accommodation for employees near the factory. The appellant asserted that such services indirectly relate to manufacturing activities. Referring to case laws like Reliance Industries Ltd. and Ultratech Cement Ltd., the appellant argued for the credit. The Tribunal, in line with the precedents, allowed the credit for construction of residential facilities.

3. Construction of Road within Factory Premises:
The credit for constructing roads within the factory premises was initially disallowed. The appellant argued that these roads facilitate the movement of goods within the factory, thus falling under services used in or in relation to manufacture. Citing the case of CCE vs. ITC Ltd., the appellant supported their claim. The Tribunal agreed, allowing the credit for road construction.

4. Outdoor Catering:
The credit for outdoor catering services used for maintaining the employee canteen was initially disallowed. The appellant contended that catering for employees is a statutory obligation and should qualify as a service used in or in relation to manufacture. Referring to a previous favorable decision, the Tribunal upheld the credit for outdoor catering.

5. Rain Water Harvesting:
The service tax paid for rainwater harvesting services was initially denied. The appellant argued that in Rajasthan, rainwater harvesting is a statutory obligation related to manufacturing. The Tribunal agreed, allowing the credit for rainwater harvesting services.

6. Other Services:
A Cenvat credit of a specific amount was denied without specifying the service. The appellant argued that this demand was made in error as no specific service was mentioned. As the demand lacked specificity and grounds for denial, the Tribunal set it aside, ruling in favor of the appellant.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant the Cenvat credit for the disputed input services.

---