Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent committed professional or other misconduct by annexing a threatening note to the bill addressed to the client and whether the Council's recommendation of reprimand was warranted.
Analysis: The complaint and disciplinary record showed that the respondent had rendered accounting services to the complainant and later raised a consolidated bill for past services. The Court treated the alleged monetary dispute as not requiring further adjudication in these proceedings. The decisive conduct was the language used in the accompanying communication, which contained a threat of legal action and a reference to tax verification in a manner found unbecoming of a Chartered Accountant. The Court construed professional misconduct under the Act broadly enough to include conduct outside the specific schedules where the act is one that a reasonable member of society would find unacceptable from a professional. The allegations regarding solicitation of work and disclosure of confidential information were not established.
Conclusion: The respondent was held guilty of misconduct for sending the threatening note and the penalty of reprimand under Section 21(6)(b) was affirmed.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the respondent, and the disciplinary penalty of reprimand stood sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A Chartered Accountant may be found guilty of professional or other misconduct for conduct unbecoming of a professional, even if the act is not expressly enumerated in the schedules, where the conduct is one that civil society would reasonably censure.