Treaty exclusion for educational teaching fees prevents Indian tax and withholding, with no permanent establishment found.

Fees received for an educational programme were treated as outside taxability in India because the treaty excluded amounts spent for teaching in or by educational institutions; the applicant's status as an educational and charitable institution supported application of that exclusion, and no withholding tax was required under section 195. The short-duration teaching activity in India was also held not to create a permanent establishment, as the visiting faculty arrangement did not amount to a fixed taxable presence under the treaty. The result was that the programme consideration remained exempt from Indian tax and the teaching activity did not create taxable presence in India.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the programme fee received under the agreement was chargeable to tax in India as fees for included services under the treaty and the Income-tax Act, and whether withholding tax was required; (ii) Whether the applicant's teaching activities in India created a permanent establishment in India.

Issue (i): Whether the programme fee received under the agreement was chargeable to tax in India as fees for included services under the treaty and the Income-tax Act, and whether withholding tax was required.

Analysis: The relevant treaty provision excluded from fees for included services amounts spent for teaching in or by educational institutions. The applicant's incorporation documents and exemption status showed that it was an educational and charitable institution. The programme involved teaching activities undertaken pursuant to the agreement, and the treaty provision was treated as applicable on the same footing as the earlier ruling relied upon.

Conclusion: The programme fee was not taxable in India as fees for included services, and no withholding tax was required under section 195.

Issue (ii): Whether the applicant's teaching activities in India created a permanent establishment in India.

Analysis: The short-duration teaching activity was examined in light of the treaty definition of permanent establishment. The objection that the faculty was supplied through another university and that the visiting faculty's stay created a fixed presence was rejected. The earlier ruling relied upon had also declined to find a permanent establishment on similar facts.

Conclusion: The applicant did not have a permanent establishment in India.

Final Conclusion: The treaty exemption applied to the consideration received for the educational programme, and the short-term teaching arrangement did not give rise to taxable presence in India.

Ratio Decidendi: Where services consist of teaching by or in an educational institution, the treaty exclusion for fees for included services applies, and short-term educational activity of that nature does not by itself create a permanent establishment.

---