Tribunal adjusts disallowances, cites Supreme Court ruling

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of interest disallowance and reducing the indirect expenditure disallowance to 10% of dividend income. The disallowance of transaction charges was overturned based on a Supreme Court ruling. The decision was issued on 1st August 2016.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
2. Disallowance of transaction charges paid to stock exchanges under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194J.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:

a) The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the disallowance of Rs. 8,88,154/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, rejecting the appellant's explanations. The appellant argued that the interest paid was mainly for loans taken for fixed assets and working capital, and that the CIT(A) had previously deleted such interest expenses for AY 2007-08. The Assessing Officer, relying on the Special Bench decision in Daga Capital Management P Ltd., computed the disallowance of Rs. 7,09,975/- for interest under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and Rs. 1,78,179/- for indirect expenditure under Rule 8D(2)(iii).

b) The appellant contended that the investments were made from surplus/interest-free funds, citing the Hon'ble Bombay High Court decisions in CIT vs Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. and HDFC Bank Ltd. The investments were strategic, made in subsidiaries and associate companies, and should not attract disallowance. The appellant also argued that stock-in-trade should not be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D.

c) The Tribunal found that at the time of investment, the appellant had sufficient surplus/own funds, thus no disallowance of interest should be made. The disallowance of indirect expenditure for strategic investments and stock-in-trade was also deemed inappropriate. The Tribunal decided to scale down the disallowance to 10% of the dividend income, amounting to Rs. 2,95,450/-, as a reasonable estimate for indirect expenditure.

2. Disallowance of Transaction Charges under Section 40(a)(ia):

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the disallowance of Rs. 1,71,840/- for transaction charges paid to stock exchanges, citing non-deduction of TDS under Section 194J. The CIT(A) relied on the Bombay High Court decision in CIT vs. Kotak Securities Ltd. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision, ruling that such payments are not for 'technical services' but for facilities provided by the stock exchange, and thus, no TDS is required under Section 194J. The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's judgment, held that no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was warranted.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance of interest and scaled down the indirect expenditure disallowance to 10% of the dividend income. The disallowance of transaction charges was also overturned, following the Supreme Court's ruling. The order was pronounced on 1st August 2016.

---