Refund claim requires fresh examination of service classification, amended notification scope, and supporting documents before decision.

Classification of the exported service, the scope of the amended refund notification, and the adequacy of supporting invoices and documents required fresh examination. The Tribunal noted that the cited precedents were relevant to the dispute and that the Original Authority had not properly scrutinised the documentary record. It therefore remanded the matter for de novo consideration after applying the cited decisions and verifying all invoices and supporting documents.

---

---

Issues: Whether the refund claim required fresh adjudication in the light of the cited precedents and verification of the supporting invoices and documents.

Analysis: The appeal raised questions on classification of the exported service, the applicability of the amended refund notification, and the sufficiency of documentary support. The Tribunal noted that the cited decisions on service classification and on the scope of the amended notification were relevant to the controversy. It also found that the documents and invoices had not been properly scrutinized by the Original Authority, making a fresh examination necessary.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for de novo consideration after examining the cited decisions and verifying all documents and invoices.

---