Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (9) TMI 557 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal clarifies tax deduction rules: set off losses from non-eligible units against eligible unit profits The Tribunal held that for the computation of deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, the loss from a non-eligible unit should be set off ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal clarifies tax deduction rules: set off losses from non-eligible units against eligible unit profits

                            The Tribunal held that for the computation of deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, the loss from a non-eligible unit should be set off against the profit of an eligible unit. It clarified that Section 10B provides for a deduction, not an exemption, and that both profits and losses must be considered in computing total income. The Tribunal followed the precedence of jurisdictional High Court decisions over conflicting judgments from other High Courts, supporting the set-off of losses from non-eligible units against profits of eligible units. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was allowed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the loss from a non-eligible unit can be set off against the profit of an eligible unit for the computation of deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Interpretation of Section 10B as a deduction versus an exemption.
                            3. Applicability of Circular No. 7/DV/2013 regarding the set-off and carry forward of business losses.
                            4. Precedence of jurisdictional High Court decisions over conflicting judgments from other High Courts.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Whether the loss from a non-eligible unit can be set off against the profit of an eligible unit for the computation of deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
                            The Tribunal examined whether the loss from the non-eligible unit can be set off against the profit of the eligible unit. The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 10B without adjusting the loss from the non-eligible unit. The Tribunal held that deduction under Section 10B should be computed after adjusting the loss of the non-eligible unit with the profit of the eligible unit, in line with Sections 70 and 71 of the Act. This means that the total income should be computed by aggregating the income/loss from various sources under the same head before allowing any deduction under Section 10B.

                            2. Interpretation of Section 10B as a deduction versus an exemption:
                            The Tribunal clarified that Section 10B, as amended by the Finance Act, 2000, provides for a deduction rather than an exemption. This interpretation was supported by decisions from the Bombay High Court, which stated that Section 10B now allows for a deduction from the total income of the assessee, rather than excluding the income from the total income. The Tribunal emphasized that both profits and losses must be considered in computing the total income, aligning with Section 80-AB, which overrides other sections in Chapter VI-A.

                            3. Applicability of Circular No. 7/DV/2013 regarding the set-off and carry forward of business losses:
                            The Tribunal referred to Circular No. 7/DV/2013, which clarified that Sections 10A and 10B provide for deductions from the total income computed under the Act. The Circular highlighted that the provisions of Chapter IV and Chapter VI should be applied in computing the income for the purpose of deduction under Sections 10A and 10B. This means that income/loss from eligible and ineligible units should be aggregated in accordance with Sections 70 and 71 before allowing the deduction under Section 10B.

                            4. Precedence of jurisdictional High Court decisions over conflicting judgments from other High Courts:
                            The Tribunal acknowledged conflicting judgments from different High Courts on the issue but decided to follow the jurisdictional High Court's rulings. The decisions of the Bombay High Court in Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs DCIT and CIT vs Galaxy Surfactants Ltd. were considered binding. These judgments supported the view that losses from non-eligible units should be set off against the profits of eligible units before computing the deduction under Section 10B. The Tribunal also noted that the Supreme Court's decision in Jeyar Consultant & Investment Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT, although in the context of Section 80HHC, reinforced the principle that the computation of income should consider both profits and losses.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal concluded that deduction under Section 10B should be computed after adjusting the loss of the non-eligible unit with the profit of the eligible unit, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 70 and 71 of the Act. The Tribunal's decision was consistent with the jurisdictional High Court's rulings and Circular No. 7/DV/2013, which clarified the computation of income for deductions under Sections 10A and 10B. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was allowed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found