Supreme Court Upholds Govt Decision on Income Tax Act Approval Process

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Union of India, overturning the High Court's decision that set aside the rejection of extending approval under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the decision-making process followed the prescribed authority as per the Govt. of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961, despite the initial approval being conveyed by the Director. The Court found the High Court's reasoning flawed in striking down the extension based on the decision-maker's perceived incompetence, leading to the appeal being allowed and the High Court's order set aside.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge of refusal to extend approval under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on authority of decision-maker.

Analysis:
The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the rejection of the extension of approval under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court had set aside the rejection on the grounds that it was made by the Director and not by the competent authority, the Finance Minister. The Union of India appealed against this decision. The Court noted that the initial approval was ordered by the Minister but conveyed by the Director. The decision not to extend the approval was approved by the prescribed authority, as per the requirements of the Govt. of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961. The appellant contended that the decision complied with the rule, going through the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and then to the Minister. The Court found that the High Court erred in striking down the extension of approval based on the decision-maker being the Director, who was deemed incompetent. As the appellant's contentions were uncontroverted, the Court concluded that the High Court's decision was unjustified, and therefore, set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal.

---