TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms partial interest waiver decision under Income Tax Act, emphasizing valid reasons over automaticity.</h1> <h3>SMT. NIMMI JOHN CHACKOLA Versus THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN AND OTHERS</h3> SMT. NIMMI JOHN CHACKOLA Versus THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN AND OTHERS - TMI Issues:1. Petition seeking waiver of interest under Income Tax Act.2. Interpretation of Section 220(2A) regarding waiver of interest.3. Application of genuine hardship criteria for interest waiver.4. Discretion of Commissioner in granting interest waiver.Analysis:1. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the waiver of interest under the Income Tax Act. The assessment order was modified, and the petitioner remitted amounts in instalments. The petitioner applied for waiver of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 220(2) of the Act. The 1st respondent granted partial waiver, leading to a dispute over the remaining interest amount of Rs. 15,06,296. The main contention was whether the entire interest should be waived under Section 220(2A) when a waiver is granted.2. The petitioner argued that when interest is waived under Section 220(2A), the entire interest charged should be waived without any limit. Citing judgments like E.M.Joseph and B.M.Malani, the petitioner emphasized the need for a comprehensive waiver when genuine hardship is proven. However, the Revenue contended that waiver should be based on sufficient cause and after considering all relevant circumstances.3. The court analyzed precedents like Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation Ltd. and emphasized the importance of genuine hardship criteria for interest waiver. The Apex Court's decision in B.M.Malani highlighted the need to determine genuine hardship objectively, considering the circumstances of the case. The court reiterated that waiver or reduction of interest should be based on valid reasons and not as a matter of course.4. Examining Section 220(2A), the court noted the conditions for reducing or waiving interest, including genuine hardship, circumstances beyond the assessee's control, and cooperation in assessments. The court found that the Commissioner had properly exercised discretion in granting partial waiver based on the fulfillment of these conditions. The court concluded that the Commissioner's decision to waive a portion of the interest was not arbitrary and did not warrant interference, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
TaxTMI 