1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal grants stay against service tax demand for works contract service, orders 10% pre-deposit.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI granted a stay application against a service tax demand of Rs. 1,10,25,578 for works contract service. The ... Stay application β demand of tax, interest and penalty β works contract service β construction service rendered to PHED β outside the scope of commerce and industry β abatement β Held that: - the building constructed for Jaipur Development authority would not fall outside the scope of being meant for commerce or industry β pre-deposit of 10% of demand to be paid for maintainability of appeal - recovery of the remaining adjudicated liability is stayed during pendency of the appeal β matter disposed off. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI considered a stay application against a service tax demand of Rs. 1,10,25,578 confirmed for works contract service. The appellant argued that the service was not for commerce or industry, citing a relevant case. The tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument and ordered a pre-deposit of 10% of the demand within eight weeks to stay recovery of the remaining liability during the appeal. Compliance was to be reported by 10.10.2016.