Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation, whether claimed or not, could be foisted upon the assessee for the purpose of calculating deduction under Chapter VI-A prior to insertion of Explanation 5 to Section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Court applied the principle that unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years, once merged with the depreciation of the current year by legal fiction, becomes part of the current year's depreciation. On that basis, the assessee cannot split the two and decline the carry-forward depreciation while seeking computation of deduction under Chapter VI-A. The governing interpretation was taken from the Supreme Court's exposition of the effect of merger of depreciation and the inability of the assessee to exercise a contrary choice once the statutory fiction operates.
Conclusion: Depreciation, whether claimed or not, could not be foisted upon the assessee even before insertion of Explanation 5 to Section 32(1) for the purpose of calculating deduction under Chapter VI-A. The answer was in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Once unabsorbed depreciation is carried forward and merges with current year depreciation, it forms part of the current year allowance and must be taken into account for Chapter VI-A computation, irrespective of whether the assessee separately claims it.