Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order levying tax and fastening TDS liability on the contractee required interference, and whether the matter should be remanded for verification of the nature of the turnover and possible double taxation.
Analysis: The levy under the Value Added Tax regime was confined to the deemed sale involved in intra-State works contracts, and did not extend to inter-State works contracts or pure service contracts. The statutory scheme under Rule 18 required the contractor to obtain and circulate Form 501-A and to enable adjustment of tax deducted at source, but that mechanism did not dilute the contractee's statutory obligation under Section 22(3) to deduct tax at source from amounts payable in respect of transactions within the Act. At the same time, the plea that the turnover may include inter-State works contracts and pure service contracts, and that tax may already have been paid on the same local works contract turnover by the contractors, raised questions that required factual verification. Since the appellate and assessing records had not been fully examined on these aspects, remand to the assessing authority was appropriate.
Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed in part by setting aside the assessment to the extent necessary and remanding the matter to the assessing authority for fresh consideration, including examination of the nature of the turnover and any duplication of tax on the same deemed sale.