Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods cleared on payment of full duty with affixed brand names could be treated as unbranded for computing the aggregate value of clearances under the SSI exemption notification and whether the demand based on such reclassification was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the assessments for the relevant year had attained finality and that the Revenue had not challenged or revised those assessments through the appropriate appellate process. In the circumstances, goods already assessed and cleared on payment of full duty could not be subsequently treated as unbranded merely to reopen the turnover computation under the exemption notification.
Conclusion: The impugned order confirming the demand could not stand and the appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The demand was set aside and consequential relief followed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Final assessments cannot be indirectly reopened for SSI exemption computation by recharacterising duly assessed clearances without resort to the prescribed appellate or review .