Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended provisions restricting sales tax incentives under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 1983 could be invoked to reopen completed assessments and revise the petitioners' deferral benefits for the relevant period.
Analysis: The incentives were granted under the Package Scheme of Incentives, the agreement, the eligibility certificate and the certificate of entitlement, all of which governed the petitioners' entitlement during the relevant period. The assessments for the period in question had already been completed and the appellate orders had also upheld the grant of deferral. The later inserted provisions introducing an annual production-capacity ceiling were sought to be applied to a closed assessment and to restrict benefits already availed under the earlier scheme. On the facts, the scheme documents did not justify such a ceiling, and the amended provisions could not be used to alter the concluded fiscal position of the petitioners.
Conclusion: The amended provisions could not be invoked against the petitioners to curtail the incentives already allowed, and the revisional notice and proposed action were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed and the impugned notice and proposed revision were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Benefits conferred under a package incentive scheme, as crystallised by the scheme documents and completed assessments, cannot be retrospectively curtailed by later amendment in the absence of an express and applicable ceiling under the original governing arrangement.