Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of full pre-deposit and stay of recovery in the pending service tax appeals.
Analysis: The appeals were found to have been filed within time. On the stay applications, the Tribunal noted the earlier stay order in the appellants' own case covering the earlier period, and also noted that the controversy appeared debatable, at least from the date of the amendment brought about with effect from 01.05.2011. At the same time, the Tribunal accepted the appellants' own position that they did not have a strong case in respect of two identified demands aggregating to Rs. 10,62,68,568/- and, in the interests of justice, considered a partial pre-deposit appropriate.
Conclusion: The Tribunal granted stay of recovery of the remaining demands subject to deposit of 50% of Rs. 10,62,68,568/- within four weeks.