Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loss on sale of an actionable claim arising from advances made to a company was a business loss allowable in computing business profits for the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: The advance of Rs. 103 lakhs was held to be a loan made as part of business activity and not an investment. Mere absence of a lending business did not prevent the transaction from being treated as a business transaction. The surrounding circumstances showed business expediency, since the advance was made to avoid enforcement of the assessee's guarantee by the bank. The treatment of interest on the advance as business income also supported the character of the advance as a business loan. On that basis, non-recovery of the amount, or the reduced recovery reflected in the assignment arrangement, constituted a business loss. The separate question of the year of allowance was treated as academic and was not answered.
Conclusion: The loss was correctly held to be a business loss allowable for the accounting year ending 31 December 1977, corresponding to Assessment Year 1978-79.
Ratio Decidendi: A loan advanced as part of business expediency, and not as an investment, gives rise to a business loss on non-recovery, even if the assessee is not ordinarily in the business of lending.