Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a composite contract involving supply of materials and service was liable to service tax as maintenance and repair service or construction of residential complex service before 01/06/2007, and as works contract service only after 01/06/2007 with the benefit of abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01/03/2006.
Analysis: The contract was found to be composite in nature, involving both supply of materials and service. On that basis, the taxable category of works contract was held to apply only after the introduction of works contract service with effect from 01/06/2007. The reasoning was supported by the principle that indivisible works contracts became liable to service tax only from the date that service category was introduced.
Conclusion: The demand for the prior period was not sustainable, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The order affirmed that composite and indivisible works contracts were taxable only from 01/06/2007 under the works contract regime, leaving the assessee outside service tax liability for the earlier period on the classification adopted by the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: An indivisible or composite works contract is liable to service tax only from the date on which works contract service was introduced, and not under earlier service categories for the same composite activity.