Rental receipts from leasing property treated as business income, not house property; decision overturned, taxed accordingly

Whether rental receipts of the taxpayer constitute "Income from House Property" or "Profits and gains of business or profession." Court reasoned that the taxpayer's admitted sole business is leasing property and earning rent, and applying the principles in prior precedent the receipts arise from business activity rather than passive house property income. Consequently the High Court's classification was incorrect; its judgments were set aside and the rental income is held taxable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession." No order as to costs.

---

---

Issues involved:
Classification of income received from renting property as "Income from House Property" or "Profit and gains of business or profession."

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of income
- The appeals were filed challenging the High Court's judgment regarding the tax treatment of income received from renting a property.
- The main issue in all appeals was whether the income from the rented property should be taxed under "Income from House Property" or "Profit and gains of business or profession."
- The appellant argued that the income should be treated as "Business Income" based on the business of renting properties.
- The Revenue contended that the income should be taxed under "Income from House Property" as leasing properties was not the main business activity as per the Memorandum of Association.

Issue 2: Legal Precedents
- The appellant cited the case of Chennai Properties and Investments Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, which established that income from renting properties can be treated as "Business Income" if it is part of the business operations.
- Reference was made to the judgment in Karanpura Development Co. Ltd. v. CIT, emphasizing the distinction between property-based assessments and income from trading operations.

Issue 3: Business Activity
- The appellant, a private limited company, primarily engaged in leasing properties as per its Memorandum of Association.
- It was noted that the company had ceased other business activities and focused solely on leasing properties to earn rental income.

Issue 4: Court's Decision
- The Supreme Court analyzed the legal principles established in previous judgments and found that the appellant's case aligned with the law laid down in the Chennai Properties case.
- The Court concluded that the income earned from leasing properties should be treated as "Profits and gains of business or profession" based on the company's business activities.
- The High Court's decision to classify the income as "Income from House Property" was overturned, and the appeals were allowed with no costs, directing the taxation of the income under the appropriate head.

By considering the legal precedents, the nature of the appellant's business activities, and the purpose of income generation, the Supreme Court clarified the classification of income from renting properties, emphasizing the importance of aligning tax treatment with the underlying business operations.

---