Research-use exemption under customs notification depends on certified end use, not mere commercial description of goods.

Goods supplied for defence and research projects were treated as exempt under Notification No. 10/97-C.E. where the prescribed certificate from the competent authority confirmed that they were required for research purposes only. The decision notes that rejection by lower authorities rested on an inadequate appreciation of the goods' nature and end use, and that a commercial description such as aircraft parts did not defeat exemption when the notification conditions were otherwise met. The operative principle is that intended research use, supported by the required certification, governs eligibility for exemption under the notification.

---

---

Issues: Whether the goods supplied for defence and research projects were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 10/97-C.E. dated 01.03.1997.

Analysis: The goods were found to have been supplied for research projects and were supported by a certificate from the competent authority not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, certifying that the goods were required for research purposes only. The rejection by the lower authorities was held to be based on an inadequate appreciation of the nature and end use of the goods. The fact that the items were described in commercial parlance as aircraft parts or other equipment parts did not, by itself, defeat the exemption when the notification conditions were otherwise satisfied.

Conclusion: The goods were held to satisfy the conditions of Notification No. 10/97-C.E. dated 01.03.1997 and were entitled to exemption.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods supplied for research purposes are eligible for exemption under the notification when the prescribed certification and other conditions are satisfied, and commercial description alone cannot override the intended research use.

---