Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (8) TMI 316 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds developer's eligibility for deductions under Section 80IB(10) for two assessment years The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, confirming the assessee's eligibility for deductions under Section 80IB(10) for AY 2008-09 and AY ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal upholds developer's eligibility for deductions under Section 80IB(10) for two assessment years

                            The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, confirming the assessee's eligibility for deductions under Section 80IB(10) for AY 2008-09 and AY 2009-10. The Tribunal held that ownership of land is not a prerequisite for claiming deductions, and the assessee, acting as a developer under the agreements, qualified for the deductions. The decision aligned with previous judgments and the High Court's interpretation, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2008-09.
                            2. Eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2008-09:

                            The Revenue contended that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XV, Ahmedabad erred in directing the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee's claim for deduction of Rs. 2,02,19,004 under Section 80IB(10). The primary argument was that the land was owned by various cooperative housing societies and not by the assessee. The societies had entered into development agreements with the assessee, who was thus seen as a contractor rather than a developer. The local authority had granted development permissions to the societies, not the assessee.

                            The assessee's counsel argued that the issue was already settled in favor of the assessee by the ITAT judgment in the case of Narayan Realty Limited vs. DCIT, and similar cases where it was held that ownership of land is not a prerequisite for claiming deduction under Section 80IB(10). The Tribunal, upon reviewing the CIT(A)'s order and the precedents, found that the CIT(A) had correctly allowed the deduction, following the ITAT's earlier judgments which established that the assessee need not be the landowner to qualify for the deduction.

                            2. Eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10:

                            For AY 2009-10, the Revenue raised similar objections, arguing that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XV, Ahmedabad erred in allowing the assessee's claim for deduction of Rs. 15,93,76,433 under Section 80IB(10). The argument was again based on the fact that the land was owned by various cooperative housing societies, and the assessee was merely a contractor executing the project under development agreements.

                            The assessee's counsel reiterated that the issue was covered by the ITAT's previous judgments, which held that the developer need not own the land to claim deductions under Section 80IB(10). The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and reviewing the CIT(A)'s order, found that the CIT(A) had rightly allowed the deduction, consistent with the ITAT's earlier rulings and the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT vs. Radhe Developers. The High Court had clarified that ownership of the land is not required for claiming deductions under Section 80IB(10).

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, confirming that the assessee was eligible for deductions under Section 80IB(10) for both AY 2008-09 and AY 2009-10. The Tribunal's decision was based on established precedents that ownership of land is not a condition for claiming such deductions, and the assessee's role as a developer under the development agreements qualified them for the deductions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s orders, aligning with the jurisdictional High Court's interpretation of the relevant provisions.

                            Order Pronouncement:

                            The order was pronounced in the court on 29th June 2016 at Ahmedabad, dismissing both appeals by the Revenue.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found