Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of imported goods sold on high seas sale basis could be enhanced by loading 2% of CIF value towards high seas sales charges instead of accepting the actual commission of Rs. 500/- agreed between the parties.
Analysis: The declared high seas sales commission was supported by a contractual arrangement and the record contained no concrete material to discredit the actual amount of Rs. 500/-. The guideline in Public Notice No. 145/2002 permitted addition of 2% service charges only where no basis for actual commission existed. In the absence of factual evidence to reject the declared commission, a notional loading based only on the public notice and departmental practice was unsustainable. The reasoning was consistent with the coordinate Bench view that the actual amount charged on high seas sale is to be added, not an assumed percentage.
Conclusion: The addition of 2% on CIF value was not justified and the declared high seas sales commission of Rs. 500/- had to be accepted.
Final Conclusion: The impugned enhancement of assessable value was set aside and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the actual high seas sales commission is contractually fixed and supported by record, it cannot be replaced by a notional percentage loading in the absence of evidence to reject the declared amount.