TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court modifies CESTAT order, no additional pre-deposit required for appeal</h1> <h3>S&S Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Service Tax, New Delhi-I</h3> S&S Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Service Tax, New Delhi-I - TMI Issues:1. Determination of pre-deposit amount by Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)2. Plea of the Appellant for credit of already deposited amount3. Opposing plea by Respondent4. Modification of CESTAT's order by High CourtAnalysis:1. The High Court addressed the issue of the pre-deposit amount determined by CESTAT in an appeal against their order dated 15th March, 2016. The CESTAT had fixed the pre-deposit at Rs. 15 lakhs and declined to credit the Rs. 9.23 lakhs already deposited by the Appellant. The Appellant submitted copies of returns and challans to show the correlation between the deposited amounts and the period in question. Additionally, the Appellant deposited a further sum of Rs. 5.77 lakhs. Consequently, the High Court found that the total amount deposited by the Appellant amounted to Rs. 15 lakhs, as per CESTAT's pre-deposit requirement.2. The Respondent, represented by the Senior Standing Counsel, opposed the Appellant's plea for crediting the already deposited amount. The Respondent contended that the CESTAT's order did not warrant any interference. Despite the opposition, the High Court considered the submissions made by both parties.3. After considering the submissions, the High Court modified the CESTAT's order. It directed that since the Appellant had already deposited Rs. 9.32 lakhs and an additional Rs. 5.77 lakhs, totaling Rs. 15 lakhs, there was no need for the Appellant to make any further pre-deposit payment as per CESTAT's order. The High Court further instructed that the CESTAT should proceed to hear the pending appeal on its merits without requiring any additional pre-deposit from the Appellant.4. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the present appeal and application based on the modified terms. The order was to be issued under the signature of the Court Master for further action. The judgment clarified the pre-deposit issue, acknowledged the Appellant's payments, and allowed the appeal to proceed without any additional financial obligations from the Appellant.
TaxTMI 