Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court quashes improper assessments, upholds tribunal decisions, emphasizes legal procedures and integrity.</h1> <h3>M/s Sakthi Hotels (Restaurant) Versus The Commercial Tax Officer (CT)</h3> M/s Sakthi Hotels (Restaurant) Versus The Commercial Tax Officer (CT) - TMI Issues involved:Challenging assessment orders for multiple years, re-opening of assessments on the same grounds, failure to consider previous tribunal orders, validity of assessment based on personal opinion, abdication of powers by the Assessing Officer, contempt of interim orders.Analysis:The petitioner, M/s Sakthi Hotels (Restaurant), challenged assessment orders for various years, including 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012. The respondent re-opened assessments without filing a counter affidavit or seeking to vacate the interim stay granted by the Court, leading to fresh orders dated 17.03.2015. The Court noted that re-opening assessments without new grounds was improper, especially after the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal had previously rejected similar contentions raised by the respondent. The petitioner argued that they were a separate entity from a lodging house, and previous tribunal decisions supported their case. The Court emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to independently evaluate evidence instead of relying solely on Enforcement Wing reports.The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's earlier decision, which had become final, established that the petitioner was distinct from the lodging house and not subject to higher tax rates. The Court highlighted the respondent's lack of tangible material to justify re-opening assessments and failure to provide fresh evidence to link the petitioner to the star-rated lodging house. The Court found the re-opening of assessments while interim stay orders were in place amounted to contempt of court orders, further strengthening the petitioner's case.In conclusion, the Court allowed the Writ Petitions, quashed the impugned assessment orders, and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petitions. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal procedures, considering previous tribunal decisions, and respecting court orders to maintain the integrity of the assessment process.