Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether full waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty was warranted in a case where the applicants claimed that bandwidth/telecommunication links provided to other telegraph authorities were outside the scope of taxable service.
Analysis: The demand was founded on services provided to various customers. On the material placed, two of the customers were not registered under the first proviso to Section 4(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and therefore could not be treated as telegraph authorities. In that situation, the claim for complete waiver was not supported on a prima facie basis. The Tribunal accepted that the liability, for stay purposes, appeared confined to a much smaller amount than the demand as a whole.
Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit was refused. The applicants were directed to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs, and waiver was granted only for the balance amount of service tax and penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: A complete waiver of pre-deposit is not justified where, prima facie, part of the taxable service is found to have been rendered to entities that are not telegraph authorities and therefore fall within the taxable net.