Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on breach of the exemption conditions by discontinuance of the unit before the eligible period, the Commissioner could in revision withdraw the benefit of adjusting the assessed sales tax liability against the surviving exemption limit and direct payment of tax, interest and penalty.
Analysis: The exemption scheme required the eligible unit to remain in continuous production during the eligibility period. That condition was admittedly not satisfied. Under the exemption notification, contravention of any condition caused the exemption to cease to operate and the tax that would otherwise have been payable became recoverable from the unit. In that situation, the Assessing Officer could not validly adjust the assessed sales tax liability against the residual exemption limit, because the very basis for the adjustment had ceased. The revisional authority was competent under section 67 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act to correct the erroneous order. The Tribunal, however, deleted the penalty portion.
Conclusion: The revision was maintainable and the Commissioner's withdrawal of the exemption adjustment was upheld. The petitioners challenge failed, and the petition was dismissed.