CESTAT Chennai: Business Wins Appeal on Taxable Value Ratio, Excludes Material Cost.

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI allowed the appeal of a business providing tyre re-treading services, which had declared only 30% of total charges as taxable value in their service tax returns. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument that the 70:30 ratio was based on actual material costs and that the cost of materials was excluded from taxable value under Notification No. 12/03. Citing a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, clarifying the treatment of goods sold in conjunction with taxable services.

---

---

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, consisting of Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri P. Karthikeyan, heard an appeal from a business providing tyre re-treading services. The business declared only 30% of total charges collected from customers as taxable value in their service tax returns for the period 2005-06, treating the remaining 70% as a sale account for tread rubbers. The department alleged underpayment of service tax and Education Cess, leading to a demand and penalty. The appellants argued that the 70:30 ratio was based on actual material costs, ascertained from MRF invoices, and that the cost of materials was excluded from taxable value under Notification No. 12/03. The Tribunal agreed, citing a Supreme Court decision that allowed for the bifurcation of transactions into sales and service portions for tax purposes. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal on 16-12-2008. The judgment clarified the legal position on the treatment of goods sold in conjunction with taxable services.

---